Corpus iurisprudentiae Romanae

Repertorium zu den Quellen des römischen Rechts

Digesta Iustiniani Augusti

Recognovit Mommsen (1870) et retractavit Krüger (1928)
Convertit in Anglica lingua Scott (1932)
Paul.not. Pap. resp.
Notae ad Papiniani Responsorum librosPauli Notae ad Papiniani Responsorum libros

Notae ad Papiniani Responsorum libros

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50

Ex libro V

Dig. 42,8,16Pau­lus li­bro quin­to re­spon­so­rum Pa­pi­nia­ni. ni­si prio­res pe­cu­nia pos­te­rio­rum di­mis­si pro­ben­tur.

Paulus, Opinions of Papinianus, Book V. Unless the creditors having prior claims are paid with the money of subsequent ones.

Ex libro VI

Dig. 28,4,4Pa­pi­nia­nus li­bro sex­to re­spon­so­rum. Plu­ri­bus ta­bu­lis eo­dem ex­em­plo scrip­tis unius tes­ta­men­ti vo­lun­ta­tem eo­dem tem­po­re do­mi­nus sol­lem­ni­ter com­ple­vit. si quas­dam ta­bu­las in pu­bli­co de­po­si­tas abs­tu­lit at­que de­le­vit, quae iu­re ges­ta sunt, prae­ser­tim cum ex ce­te­ris ta­bu­lis quas non abs­tu­lit res ges­ta de­cla­re­tur, non con­sti­tuen­tur ir­ri­ta. Paulus notat: sed si, ut in­tes­ta­tus mo­re­re­tur, in­ci­dit ta­bu­las et hoc ad­pro­ba­ve­rint hi qui ab in­tes­ta­to venire de­si­de­rant, scrip­tis avo­ca­bi­tur he­redi­tas.

Papinianus, Opinions, Book VII. A testator solemnly indicated his wishes in a will, several copies of which were made at the same time; and he afterwards removed and erased some of these which had been deposited in a public place. Whatever provisions were legally made by said will, and which could be established by the other copies of the same which the testator did not remove, were not held to have been annulled. Paulus states that if the testator defaced the will in order that he might die intestate, and if those who desired to inherit ab intestato were able to prove this, the heirs mentioned in the will would be deprived of the property.

Ex libro VII

Dig. 33,1,9Pa­pi­nia­nus li­bro sep­ti­mo re­spon­so­rum. Fun­dus, quem pa­ter fa­mi­lias li­ber­tis le­ga­to­rum no­mi­ne, quae in an­nos sin­gu­los re­lin­quit, pig­nus es­se vo­luit, ex cau­sa fi­dei­com­mis­si rei ser­van­dae gra­tia rec­te pe­te­tur. Paulus notat: hoc ad­mit­ten­dum est et in aliis re­bus he­redi­ta­riis, ut et in eas le­ga­ta­rius mit­ta­tur.

Ad Dig. 33,1,9Windscheid: Lehrbuch des Pandektenrechts, 7. Aufl. 1891, Bd. III, § 656, Note 1.Papinianus, Opinions, Book VII. A tract of land, which a testator desired to be hypothecated to secure legacies payable annually to his freedman, can be lawfully claimed by them on the ground of a trust, for the purpose of preserving the land. Paulus states that this rule also applies to other property belonging to an estate, to enable the legatee to be placed in possession of the same.