Corpus iurisprudentiae Romanae

Repertorium zu den Quellen des römischen Rechts

Digesta Iustiniani Augusti

Recognovit Mommsen (1870) et retractavit Krüger (1928)
Convertit in Anglica lingua Scott (1932)
Mod.praescr.
De praescriptionibus lib.Modestini De praescriptionibus libri

De praescriptionibus libri

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50

Ex libro singulari

Dig. 5,2,12Idem li­bro sin­gu­la­ri de prae­scrip­tio­ni­bus. Ni­hil in­ter­est si­bi re­lic­tum le­ga­tum fi­lius ex­he­redatus ad­gno­ve­rit an fi­lio ser­vo­ve re­lic­tum con­se­cu­tus sit: utru­bi­que enim prae­scrip­tio­ne sub­mo­ve­bi­tur. quin et­iam si idem in­sti­tu­tum ser­vum prius­quam ad­ire he­redi­ta­tem iu­be­ret ma­nu­mi­se­rit, ut il­le suo ar­bi­trio ad­eat he­redi­ta­tem, id­que frau­du­len­to con­si­lio fe­ce­rit, sum­mo­ve­bi­tur ab ac­tio­ne. 1Si a sta­tu­li­be­ro ex­he­redatus pe­cu­niam pe­te­re coe­pe­rit, vi­de­ri ad­gno­vis­se pa­ren­tis iu­di­cium. 2Si cum fi­lius ad­emp­tum le­ga­tum in­sti­tue­rit pe­te­re sum­mo­tus re­pe­tat in­of­fi­cio­si que­rel­lam, prae­scrip­tio­ne re­mo­ven­dus non est: quam­vis enim agen­do tes­ta­men­tum com­pro­ba­ve­rit, ta­men est ali­quid, quod tes­ta­to­ris vi­tio re­pu­te­tur, ut me­ri­to re­pel­len­dus non sit. 3Fi­lius tes­ta­to­ris, qui cum Ti­tio eius­dem pe­cu­niae reus fue­rat, li­be­ra­tio­ne Ti­tio le­ga­ta per ac­cep­ti­la­tio­nem Ti­tii li­be­ra­tus ab ac­tio­ne in­of­fi­cio­si non sum­mo­ve­bi­tur.

The Same, On Prescriptions, Book XII. It makes no difference whether a son who is disinherited accepts a legacy bequeathed to him, or obtains it through his son or slave, to whom it was left; in either instance he will be barred by an exception. Again if his slave is appointed heir, and the son manumits him before he directs him to enter upon the estate, so that he may do so of his own free will, and the son does this with a fraudulent design, he will be prevented from proceeding with his action. 1Where a son who has been disinherited makes a demand upon a statuliber for money due him, he is held to have accepted his father’s will. 2Where a son brings suit to obtain a legacy which was revoked, and, having failed, has recourse to a complaint for inofficiousness, he will not be barred by an exception; although by the mere fact of his bringing suit he approved of the will, still, some blame should be attributed to the testator, so that the claim of the son cannot reasonably be rejected. 3Where the son of a testator, along with Titius, was a debtor for a certain sum of money, and Titius was released by the terms of the will, the son will not be discharged from liability on account of the release of Titius; nor will his right to bring an action of inofficious testament be barred.

Dig. 49,1,20Idem li­bro sin­gu­la­ri de prae­scrip­tio­ni­bus. Qui su­spec­tum tu­to­rem fa­cit et qui de non re­ci­pien­da tu­te­la ex­cu­sa­tio­nem agi­tat, alie­no no­mi­ne age­re in­tel­le­gen­dus est. 1Is ve­ro qui in rem suam pro­cu­ra­tor da­tus est, in­tra bi­duum ap­pel­la­re de­bet, quia suam cau­sam agit. 2Mi­li­ti­bus ap­pel­lan­di tem­po­ra non re­mit­tun­tur, et vic­ti si non pro­vo­ca­ve­rint et sol­lem­nia fe­ce­rint, post­ea non au­diun­tur.

The Same, On Prescriptions. Anyone who accuses a guardian of being liable to suspicion, and calls in question his excuse for not accepting the guardianship, is understood to act in the name of another. 1He who is appointed an attorney in his own behalf should appeal within two days, because he is conducting his own case. 2No further time for appeal is granted to soldiers, and if, after having been defeated, they do not appeal and comply with the usual formalities, they shall not afterwards be heard.

Dig. 49,14,10Idem li­bro sin­gu­la­ri de prae­scrip­tio­ni­bus. Non pu­to de­lin­que­re eum, qui in du­biis quaes­tio­ni­bus con­tra fis­cum fa­ci­le re­spon­de­rit.

Ad Dig. 49,14,10Windscheid: Lehrbuch des Pandektenrechts, 7. Aufl. 1891, Bd. I, § 58, Note 2.The Same, Prescriptions. I do not think that he violates his duty who, in questions which are doubtful, readily answers against the Treasury.

Dig. 50,16,106Idem li­bro sin­gu­la­ri de prae­scrip­tio­ni­bus. ‘Di­mis­so­riae lit­te­rae’ di­cun­tur, quae vol­go apos­to­li di­cun­tur. di­mis­so­riae au­tem dic­tae, quod cau­sa ad eum qui ap­pel­la­tus est di­mit­ti­tur.

The Same, On Prescriptions. Letters of dismissal are those which are ordinarily styled letters of appeal. They are so called because by their means a case is sent to the court to which an appeal is made.

Ex libro IV

Dig. 45,1,101Idem li­bro quar­to de prae­scrip­tio­ni­bus. Pu­be­res si­ne cu­ra­to­ri­bus suis pos­sunt ex sti­pu­la­tu ob­li­ga­ri.

Ad Dig. 45,1,101Windscheid: Lehrbuch des Pandektenrechts, 7. Aufl. 1891, Bd. I, § 71, Note 8.The Same, On Prescriptions, Book IV. Persons who have arrived at the age of puberty can bind themselves under a stipulation without their curators.