Corpus iurisprudentiae Romanae

Repertorium zu den Quellen des römischen Rechts

Digesta Iustiniani Augusti

Recognovit Mommsen (1870) et retractavit Krüger (1928)
Convertit in Anglica lingua Scott (1932)
Dig. III4,
Quod cuiuscumque universitatis nomine vel contra eam agatur
Liber tertius
IV.

Quod cuiuscumque universitatis nomine vel contra eam agatur

(How Proceedings Are Instituted For, or Against Corporations.)

1Gaius li­bro ter­tio ad edic­tum pro­vin­cia­le. Ne­que so­cie­tas ne­que col­le­gium ne­que hu­ius­mo­di cor­pus pas­sim om­ni­bus ha­be­re con­ce­di­tur: nam et le­gi­bus et se­na­tus con­sul­tis et prin­ci­pa­li­bus con­sti­tu­tio­ni­bus ea res co­er­ce­tur. pau­cis ad­mo­dum in cau­sis con­ces­sa sunt hu­ius­mo­di cor­po­ra: ut ec­ce vec­ti­ga­lium pu­bli­co­rum so­ciis per­mis­sum est cor­pus ha­be­re vel au­ri­fo­di­na­rum vel ar­gen­ti­fo­di­na­rum et sa­li­na­rum. item col­le­gia Ro­mae cer­ta sunt, quo­rum cor­pus se­na­tus con­sul­tis at­que con­sti­tu­tio­ni­bus prin­ci­pa­li­bus con­fir­ma­tum est, vel­uti pis­to­rum et quo­run­dam alio­rum, et na­vi­cu­la­rio­rum, qui et in pro­vin­ciis sunt. 1Qui­bus au­tem per­mis­sum est cor­pus ha­be­re col­le­gii so­cie­ta­tis si­ve cu­ius­que al­te­rius eo­rum no­mi­ne, pro­prium est ad ex­em­plum rei pu­bli­cae ha­be­re res com­mu­nes, ar­cam com­mu­nem et ac­to­rem si­ve syn­di­cum, per quem tam­quam in re pu­bli­ca, quod com­mu­ni­ter agi fie­ri­que opor­teat, aga­tur fiat. 2Quod si ne­mo eos de­fen­dat, quod eo­rum com­mu­ne erit pos­si­de­ri et, si ad­mo­ni­ti non ex­ci­ten­tur ad sui de­fen­sio­nem, venire se ius­su­rum pro­con­sul ait. et qui­dem non es­se ac­to­rem vel syn­di­cum tunc quo­que in­tel­le­gi­mus, cum is ab­sit aut va­le­tu­di­ne im­pe­die­tur aut in­ha­bi­lis sit ad agen­dum. 3Et si ex­tra­neus de­fen­de­re ve­lit uni­ver­si­ta­tem, per­mit­tit pro­con­sul, sic­ut in pri­va­to­rum de­fen­sio­ni­bus ob­ser­va­tur, quia eo mo­do me­lior con­di­cio uni­ver­si­ta­tis fit.

1Gaius, On the Provincial Edict, Book III. All persons are not permitted indiscriminately to form corporations, associations, or similar bodies, for this is regulated by laws, Decrees of the Senate, and constitutions of the Emperors. Associations of this description are authorized, in very few instances; as, for example, the right to form corporations is permitted to those engaged as partners in the collection of public taxes, or associated together in working gold, silver, and salt mines. There are also certain guilds at Rome whose organization has been confirmed by Decrees of the Senate, and Edicts of the Emperors; as, for instance, those of bakers, and some others, as well as that of ship-owners, which also exists in the provinces. 1When persons are allowed to form associations under the title of a corporation, guild, or any other body of this kind, they are, like a municipality, entitled to have common property, a common treasure chest, and an agent or a syndic, and, as in the case of a municipality, whatever is transacted and done by him is considered to be transacted and done by all. 2Where an association has no one to defend it, the Proconsul says that he will order its common property to be taken into possession, and if, having been warned, they do not take measures to defend themselves, he will order the property to be sold. We understand that an association has no agent, or syndic, when he is absent, or prevented by illness, or is otherwise incapable of transacting business. 3Where a stranger appears to defend a society, the Proconsul permits him to do so, as happens in the case of the defence of private persons; because in this way the condition of the society is improved.

2Ul­pia­nus li­bro oc­ta­vo ad edic­tum. Si mu­ni­ci­pes vel ali­qua uni­ver­si­tas ad agen­dum det ac­to­rem, non erit di­cen­dum qua­si a plu­ri­bus da­tum sic ha­be­ri: hic enim pro re pu­bli­ca vel uni­ver­si­ta­te in­ter­ve­nit, non pro sin­gu­lis.

2Ulpianus, On the Edict, Book VIII. Where the members of a municipality, or of any association, appoint an agent to attend to their legal business, it must not be said that he shall be considered to have been appointed by several individuals, for he appears for the entire community, or association, and not for the members separately.

3Idem li­bro no­no ad edic­tum. Nul­li per­mit­ti­tur no­mi­ne ci­vi­ta­tis vel cu­riae ex­per­i­ri ni­si ei, cui lex per­mit­tit, aut le­ge ces­san­te or­do de­dit, cum duae par­tes ad­es­sent aut am­plius quam duae.

3The Same, On the Edict, Book IX. No one is allowed to institute proceedings in the name of a city or a curia except he who is authorized to do so by law; or, where there is no law, he is authorized by a vote of the members, when two-thirds, or more then two-thirds of them are present.

4Pau­lus li­bro no­no ad edic­tum. Pla­ne ut duae par­tes de­cu­rio­num ad­fue­rint, is quo­que quem de­cer­nent nu­me­ra­ri pot­est.

4Paulus, On the Edict, Book IX. It is evident that, in order to make up the two-thirds of the decurions, the person appointed may be included.

5Ul­pia­nus li­bro oc­ta­vo ad edic­tum. Il­lud no­tan­dum Pom­po­nius ait, quod et pa­tris suf­fra­gium fi­lio prod­erit et fi­lii pa­tri,

5Ulpianus, On the Edict, Book VIII. It must be noted, as Pomponius says, that the vote of a father will be accepted for the benefit of his son and, that of a son for the benefit of his father.

6Pau­lus li­bro no­no ad edic­tum. item eo­rum, qui in eius­dem po­tes­ta­te sunt: qua­si de­cu­rio enim hoc de­dit, non qua­si do­mes­ti­ca per­so­na. quod et in ho­no­rum pe­ti­tio­ne erit ser­van­dum, ni­si lex mu­ni­ci­pii vel per­pe­tua con­sue­tu­do pro­hi­beat. 1Si de­cu­rio­nes de­cre­ve­runt ac­tio­nem per eum mo­ven­dam quem duum­vi­ri ele­ge­rint, is vi­de­tur ab or­di­ne elec­tus et id­eo ex­per­i­ri pot­est: par­vi enim re­fert, ip­se or­do ele­ge­rit an is cui or­do neg­otium de­dit. sed si ita de­cre­ve­rint, ut quae­cum­que in­ci­dis­set con­tro­ver­sia, eius pe­ten­dae neg­otium Ti­tius ha­be­ret, ip­so iu­re id de­cre­tum nul­lius mo­men­ti es­se, quia non pos­sit vi­de­ri de ea re, quae ad­huc in con­tro­ver­sia non sit, de­cre­to da­tam per­se­cu­tio­nem. sed ho­die haec om­nia per syn­di­cos so­lent se­cun­dum lo­co­rum con­sue­tu­di­nem ex­pli­ca­ri. 2Quid si ac­tor da­tus post­ea de­cre­to de­cu­rio­num pro­hi­bi­tus sit, an ex­cep­tio ei no­ceat? et pu­to sic hoc ac­ci­pien­dum, ut ei per­mis­sa vi­dea­tur, cui et per­mis­sa du­rat. 3Ac­tor uni­ver­si­ta­tis si agat, com­pel­li­tur et­iam de­fen­de­re, non au­tem com­pel­li­tur ca­ve­re de ra­to. sed in­ter­dum si de de­cre­to du­bi­te­tur, pu­to in­ter­po­nen­dam et de ra­to cau­tio­nem. ac­tor ita­que is­te pro­cu­ra­to­ris par­ti­bus fun­gi­tur et iu­di­ca­ti ac­tio ei ex edic­to non da­tur ni­si in rem suam da­tus sit. et con­sti­tui ei pot­est. ex is­dem cau­sis mu­tan­di ac­to­ris po­tes­tas erit, ex qui­bus et­iam pro­cu­ra­to­ris. ac­tor et­iam fi­lius fa­mi­lias da­ri pot­est.

6Paulus, On the Edict, Book IX. The votes of those who are under the same control shall be counted in like manner; for each party casts his vote as a decurion, and not as a person belonging to the household. The same rule is to be observed where votes are cast for the candidate for an office; unless some municipal law, or long established custom forbids it. 1If the decurions have decided that legal proceedings shall be instituted by the party selected by the duumvirs, he is considered to have been elected by the entire body, and therefore he can proceed; for it makes but little difference whether the body itself chose him, or someone who had authority to do so. But if they have decided that whenever a controversy arises, Titius should have authority to bring suit with reference to it; the resolution would be of no effect, because it cannot be held that the right to bring suit is conferred with reference to a matter which is not yet in controversy. At the present time, however, it is usual for all matters of this kind to be attended to by syndics, according to the custom of the various localities. 2Where an agent is appointed, can he afterwards be prevented from acting by a resolution of the decurions? Will he be barred by an exception? It is my opinion that it should be understood that he is only allowed to act so long as his permission lasts. 3Where the agent of a corporate body brings suit, he is also compelled to defend it when it is sued; but he is not required to give security for ratification. Sometimes, however, where doubt exists concerning the resolution which conferred authority upon him, I think that security for ratification should be furnished; therefore a syndic of this kind performs the functions of an ordinary agent, and a right of action for the execution of judgment is not conferred upon him by any edict, unless he was appointed with reference to a matter in which he was interested, and he can also accept a promise to pay. The power of a syndic can also be revoked for the same reason as that of an ordinary agent. The son of a family may be appointed a syndic.

7Ul­pia­nus li­bro de­ci­mo ad edic­tum. Sic­ut mu­ni­ci­pum no­mi­ne ac­tio­nem prae­tor de­dit, ita et ad­ver­sus eos ius­tis­si­me edi­cen­dum pu­ta­vit. sed et le­ga­to, qui in neg­otium pu­bli­cum sump­tum fe­cit, pu­to dan­dam ac­tio­nem in mu­ni­ci­pes. 1Si quid uni­ver­si­ta­ti de­be­tur, sin­gu­lis non de­be­tur: nec quod de­bet uni­ver­si­tas sin­gu­li de­bent. 2In de­cu­rio­ni­bus vel aliis uni­ver­si­ta­ti­bus ni­hil re­fert, utrum om­nes idem ma­neant an pars ma­neat vel om­nes im­mu­ta­ti sint. sed si uni­ver­si­tas ad unum red­it, ma­gis ad­mit­ti­tur pos­se eum con­ve­ni­re et con­ve­ni­ri, cum ius om­nium in unum rec­ci­de­rit et stet no­men uni­ver­si­ta­tis.

7Ulpianus, On the Edict, Book X. As the Prætor grants a right of action in behalf of a municipal corporation, so also he thought that it is perfectly just that the Edict should give a right of action against it. I am of the opinion, however, that a right of action is granted to a Deputy against a municipality where he has incurred expense in some matter of public business. 1Where anything is owing to a corporation, it is not due to the individual members of the same, nor do the latter owe what the entire association does. 2In matters which have reference to the body of decurions, or to other associations, is a matter of no consequence whether all the members remain in it, or only a portion, or whether they are all changed; but where the entire body is reduced to a single member, the better opinion is that he can sue, and be sued, since the right of all is merged in one, and the name of association remains.

8Ia­vo­le­nus li­bro quin­to de­ci­mo ex Cas­sio. Ci­vi­ta­tes si per eos qui res ea­rum ad­mi­nis­trant non de­fen­dun­tur nec quic­quam est cor­po­ra­le rei pu­bli­cae quod pos­si­dea­tur, per ac­tio­nes de­bi­to­rum ci­vi­ta­tis agen­ti­bus sa­tis­fie­ri opor­tet.

8Javolenus, On Cassius, Book XV. Where a municipal corporation is not defended by those who have charge of its affairs, and no common property exists of which possession may be obtained, payment must be made to those who bring suit for debts owing to the corporation.

9Pom­po­nius li­bro ter­tio de­ci­mo ad Sa­binum. Si ti­bi cum mu­ni­ci­pi­bus he­redi­tas com­mu­nis erit, fa­mi­liae er­cis­cun­dae iu­di­cium in­ter vos red­di­tur. idem­que di­cen­dum est et in fi­nium re­gun­do­rum et aquae plu­viae ar­cen­dae iu­di­cio.

9Ad Dig. 3,4,9Windscheid: Lehrbuch des Pandektenrechts, 7. Aufl. 1891, Bd. I, § 58, Note 4.Pomponius, On Sabinus, Book XIII. If you have an interest in an estate in common with a municipality, a right of action can be brought by both of you for a division of the property. The same thing may be stated with reference to an action for the establishment of boundaries, and for the prevention of the flow of rain-water upon your premises.

10Pau­lus li­bro pri­mo ma­nua­lium. Con­sti­tui pot­est ac­tor et­iam ad ope­ris no­vi nun­tia­tio­nem et ad sti­pu­la­tio­nes in­ter­po­nen­das, vel­uti le­ga­to­rum, dam­ni in­fec­ti, iu­di­ca­tum sol­vi, quam­vis ser­vo po­tius ci­vi­ta­tis ca­ve­ri de­beat: sed et si ac­to­ri cau­tum fue­rit, uti­lis ac­tio ad­mi­nis­tra­to­ri re­rum ci­vi­ta­tis da­bi­tur.

10Paulus, Manuals, Book I. A syndic can also be appointed in the case of notice of a new structure, and for the purpose of entering into stipulations; as for instance, in case of legacies, the prevention of threatened injury, or for the enforcement of a decree; although it is preferable for security to be given to a slave of the municipality, still, if it is given to the syndic, the party who has charge of the business of the municipality will have an equitable right of action.