Corpus iurisprudentiae Romanae

Repertorium zu den Quellen des römischen Rechts

Digesta Iustiniani Augusti

Recognovit Mommsen (1870) et retractavit Krüger (1928)
Convertit in Anglica lingua Scott (1932)
Dig. XLVIII23,
De sententiam passis et restitutis
Liber quadragesimus octavus
XXIII.

De sententiam passis et restitutis

(Concerning Persons Upon Whom Sentence Has Been Passed and Who Have Been Restored to Their Rights.)

1Ul­pia­nus li­bro tri­gen­si­mo oc­ta­vo ad edic­tum. Ad suc­ces­sio­nem li­ber­ti pa­tro­nus de­por­ta­tus et re­sti­tu­tus ad­mit­ti­tur. 1Sed si in me­tal­lum dam­na­tus re­sti­tua­tur, num­quid ser­vi­tus poe­nae ex­tin­guat ius pa­tro­na­tus et­iam post re­sti­tu­tio­nem? et ma­gis est, ut non ex­tin­guat ser­vi­tus ius pa­tro­na­tus.

1Ulpianus, On the Edict, Book XXXVIII. A patron who has been deported, and afterwards restored to his civil rights, is admitted to the succession of a freedman. 1If, however, a person has been condemned to the mines, does his penal servitude extinguish his right as a patron, even after his restoration? The better opinion is that penal servitude does not extinguish his rights as a patron.

2Idem li­bro quin­to opi­nio­num. Si de­por­ta­tus re­sti­tu­tus dig­ni­ta­tem qui­dem in­dul­gen­tia prin­ci­pis re­ci­pe­ra­vit, in sua au­tem om­nia bo­na non est re­sti­tu­tus, nec a cre­di­to­ri­bus nec pu­bli­co no­mi­ne con­ve­ni­ri pot­est. sed cum ei fa­cul­tas ob­la­ta es­set a prin­ci­pe bo­na quo­que sua re­ci­pe­ran­di, ma­lue­rit ea de­relin­que­re, ac­tio­ni­bus ex­ue­re se, qui­bus an­te sen­ten­tiam sub­iec­tus fue­rat, non pot­erit.

2The Same, Opinions, Book V. When a person who has been deported and restored regains his rank by the indulgence of the Emperor, but does not recover all his property, he can neither be sued by his creditors nor by the Treasury. When, however, the power of recovering his property also is offered him by the Emperor, and he prefers to relinquish it, he cannot avoid any actions brought against him before he was sentenced.

3Pa­pi­nia­nus li­bro sex­to de­ci­mo re­spon­so­rum. In in­su­lam de­por­ta­ti bo­na fis­cus poe­na re­mis­sa re­ti­nuit: cre­di­to­res ex an­te ges­to non ha­be­re cum eo qui de­bi­tor quon­dam fuit ac­tio­nes con­sti­tit. quod si bo­na cum dig­ni­ta­tis re­sti­tu­tio­ne con­ces­sa re­ci­pe­ra­ve­rit, uti­les ac­tio­nes ne­ces­sa­riae non erunt, cum et di­rec­tae com­pe­tunt.

3Papinianus, Opinions, Book XVI. The Treasury retained the property of a man who was deported to an island, after his punishment had been remitted. It is established that creditors before his conviction have no rights of action against him who was their former debtor. If, however, he recovers his property with the restitution of his rank, prætorian actions will not be necessary, for direct actions will lie.

4Pau­lus li­bro sep­ti­mo de­ci­mo quaes­tio­num. In me­tal­lum dam­na­ta mu­lier eum quem prius con­ce­pe­rat edi­dit, de­in­de a prin­ci­pe re­sti­tu­ta est. hu­ma­nius di­ce­tur et­iam co­gna­tio­nis iu­ra huic re­sti­tu­ta vi­de­ri.

4Paulus, Questions, Book XVII. A woman sentenced to the mines brought forth a child which she had previously conceived, and was afterwards restored to her rights by the Emperor. It is more humane to hold that the rights of relationship were also restored to her.