Corpus iurisprudentiae Romanae

Repertorium zu den Quellen des römischen Rechts

Digesta Iustiniani Augusti

Recognovit Mommsen (1870) et retractavit Krüger (1928)
Convertit in Anglica lingua Scott (1932)
Dig. XLVII15,
De praevaricatione
Liber quadragesimus septimus
XV.

De praevaricatione

(Concerning Prevarication.)

1Ul­pia­nus li­bro sex­to ad edic­tum prae­to­ris. Prae­va­ri­ca­tor est qua­si va­ri­ca­tor, qui di­ver­sam par­tem ad­iu­vat pro­di­ta cau­sa sua. quod no­men La­beo a va­ria cer­ta­tio­ne trac­tum ait: nam qui prae­va­ri­ca­tur, ex utra­que par­te con­sti­tit, quin im­mo ex al­te­ra. 1Is au­tem prae­va­ri­ca­tor pro­prie di­ci­tur, qui pu­bli­co iu­di­cio ac­cu­sa­ve­rit: ce­te­rum ad­vo­ca­tus non pro­prie prae­va­ri­ca­tor di­ci­tur. quid er­go de eo fiet? si­ve pri­va­to iu­di­cio si­ve pu­bli­co prae­va­ri­ca­tus sit, hoc est pro­di­de­rit cau­sam, hic ex­tra or­di­nem so­let pu­ni­ri.

1Ulpianus, On the Edict of the Prætor, Book VI. A prevaricator is a person who takes both sides, and assists the adverse party by the betrayal of his own case. This term, Labeo says, is derived from a varying contest, for he acts in this manner who, apparently being on one side, actually favors the other. 1A prevaricator, properly so called, is one who appears as accuser in a criminal prosecution. An advocate, however, is not correctly said to be a prevaricator. What then should be done with him if he should be guilty of this offence, in either a private or a public proceeding, that is to say, if he has betrayed his own side? It is usual for him to be punished arbitrarily.

2Ul­pia­nus li­bro no­no de of­fi­cio pro­con­su­lis. Scien­dum, quod ho­die is, qui prae­va­ri­ca­ti sunt, poe­na in­iun­gi­tur ex­tra­or­di­na­ria.

2Ulpianus, On the Duties of Proconsul, Book IX. It should be remembered that, at present, those who are guilty of this offence are punished with an arbitrary penalty.

3Ma­cer li­bro pri­mo pu­bli­co­rum iu­di­cio­rum. Prae­va­ri­ca­tio­nis iu­di­cium aliud pu­bli­cum, aliud mo­ri­bus in­duc­tum est. 1Nam si reus ac­cu­sa­to­ri pu­bli­co iu­di­cio id­eo prae­scri­bat, quod di­cat se eo­dem cri­mi­ne ab alio ac­cu­sa­tum et ab­so­lu­tum, ca­ve­tur le­ge Iu­lia pu­bli­co­rum, ut non prius ac­cu­se­tur, quam de prio­ris ac­cu­sa­to­ris prae­va­ri­ca­tio­ne con­sti­te­rit et pro­nun­tia­tum fue­rit. hu­ius er­go prae­va­ri­ca­tio­nis pro­nun­tia­tio pu­bli­ci iu­di­cii in­tel­le­gi­tur. 2Quod si ad­vo­ca­to prae­va­ri­ca­tio­nis cri­men in­ten­da­tur, pu­bli­cum iu­di­cium non est: nec in­ter­est, pu­bli­co an pri­va­to iu­di­cio prae­va­ri­ca­tus di­ca­tur. 3Si id­eo quis ac­cu­se­tur, quod di­ca­tur cri­men iu­di­cii pu­bli­ci de­sti­tuis­se, iu­di­cium pu­bli­cum non est, quia ne­que le­ge ali­qua de hac re cau­tum est, ne­que per se­na­tus con­sul­tum, quo poe­na quin­que au­ri li­bra­rum in de­sis­ten­tem sta­tui­tur, pu­bli­ca ac­cu­sa­tio in­duc­ta est.

3Macer, Public Prosecutions, Book I. The judgment for prevarication is either public or introduced by custom. 1If the defendant opposes the prosecutor in a criminal case, alleging that he already has been accused of the same crime by another and acquitted, it is provided by the Julian Law relating to public prosecutions that he cannot be prosecuted until the crime charged by the first accuser and the judgment rendered with reference to it have been investigated. Therefore, the decision of cases of this kind is understood to belong to the category of public prosecutions. 2Where the crime of prevarication is said to have been committed by an advocate, a public prosecution cannot be instituted; and it makes no difference whether he is said to have committed it in a public or a private proceeding. 3Therefore if anyone is accused of having abandoned a public prosecution, the case will not be public, because no provision was made for this by any law; and a public accusation is not authorized by that decree of the Senate which prescribes the penalty of five pounds of gold against anyone who abandons a case.

4Idem li­bro se­cun­do pu­bli­co­rum iu­di­cio­rum. Si is, de cu­ius ca­lum­nia agi pro­hi­be­tur, prae­va­ri­ca­tor in cau­sa iu­di­cii pu­bli­ci pro­nun­tia­tus sit, in­fa­mis erit.

4The Same, Public Prosecutions, Book II. If a person against whom an action for slander cannot be brought is convicted of being a prevaricator in a criminal case, he will become infamous.

5Ve­nu­leius Sa­tur­ni­nus li­bro se­cun­do pu­bli­co­rum iu­di­cio­rum. Ac­cu­sa­tor in prae­va­ri­ca­tio­ne con­vic­tus post­ea ex le­ge non ac­cu­sat.

5Venuleius Saturninus, Public Prosecutions, Book II. An accuser convicted of prevarication cannot afterwards bring an accusation under the law.

6Pau­lus li­bro sin­gu­la­ri de iu­di­cis pu­bli­cis. Aab im­pe­ra­to­re nos­tro et pa­tre eius re­scrip­tum est, ut in cri­mi­ni­bus, quae ex­tra or­di­nem ob­iciun­tur, prae­va­ri­ca­to­res ea­dem poe­na ad­fi­cian­tur, qua te­ne­ren­tur, si ip­si in le­gem com­mis­sis­sent, qua reus per prae­va­ri­ca­tio­nem ab­so­lu­tus est.

6Paulus, On Public Prosecutions. It was stated in a Rescript by our Emperor and his Father that, in the case of crimes which are opposed as being extraordinary, prevaricators shall be punished with the same penalty to which they would have been liable, if they themselves had violated the law by which the defendant was acquitted through their treacherous instrumentality.

7Ul­pia­nus li­bro quar­to de cen­si­bus. In om­ni­bus cau­sis, prae­ter­quam in san­gui­ne, qui de­la­to­rem cor­ru­pit, ex se­na­tus con­sul­to pro vic­to ha­be­tur.

7Ulpianus, On Taxes, Book IV. In all cases except those in which the shedding of blood is involved, anyone who corrupts the informer is considered as convicted, according to the Decree of the Senate.