Corpus iurisprudentiae Romanae

Repertorium zu den Quellen des römischen Rechts

Digesta Iustiniani Augusti

Recognovit Mommsen (1870) et retractavit Krüger (1928)
Convertit in Anglica lingua Scott (1932)
Dig. XLIII33,
De Salviano interdicto
Liber quadragesimus tertius
XXXIII.

De Salviano interdicto

(Concerning the Salvian Interdict.)

1Iu­lia­nus li­bro qua­dra­gen­si­mo no­no di­ges­to­rum. Si co­lo­nus an­cil­lam in fun­do pig­no­ris no­mi­ne du­xe­rit et eam ven­di­de­rit, quod apud emp­to­rem ex ea na­tum est, eius ad­pre­hen­den­di gra­tia uti­le in­ter­dic­tum red­di opor­tet. 1Si co­lo­nus res in fun­dum duo­rum pig­no­ris no­mi­ne in­tu­le­rit, ita ut utri­que in so­li­dum ob­li­ga­tae es­sent, sin­gu­li ad­ver­sus ex­tra­neum Sal­via­no in­ter­dic­to rec­te ex­pe­rien­tur: in­ter ip­sos ve­ro si red­da­tur hoc in­ter­dic­tum, pos­si­den­tis con­di­cio me­lior erit. at si id ac­tum fue­rit, ut pro par­ti­bus res ob­li­ga­re­tur, uti­lis ac­tio et ad­ver­sus ex­tra­neos et in­ter ip­sos da­ri de­be­bit, per quam di­mi­dias par­tes pos­ses­sio­nis sin­gu­li ad­pre­hen­dent. 2Idem ser­va­ri con­ve­niet et si co­lo­nus rem, quam cum alio com­mu­nem ha­be­bat, pig­no­ris no­mi­ne in­du­xe­rit, sci­li­cet ut pro par­te di­mi­dia pig­no­ris per­se­cu­tio de­tur.

1Julianus, Digest, Book XLIX. Ad Dig. 43,33,1 pr.Windscheid: Lehrbuch des Pandektenrechts, 7. Aufl. 1891, Bd. I, § 226a, Note 11; Bd. I, § 236, Note 5.If a tenant on a farm brings a female slave on the land, for the purpose of pledging her, and afterwards sells her, an interdict should be granted in order to obtain possession of a child born to the said female slave while she was in the hands of the purchaser. 1Ad Dig. 43,33,1,1Windscheid: Lehrbuch des Pandektenrechts, 7. Aufl. 1891, Bd. I, § 236, Note 5.If a tenant brings property on a farm, which is owned by two persons, for the purpose of pledging the same, with the understanding that it shall be jointly encumbered to both of them, each one can properly make use of the Salvian Interdict against a third party; but if this interdict is granted with reference to them alone, the position of the possessor will be preferable. If, however, it was agreed that the property should be equally encumbered to each of the joint-owners of the land, a prætorian action should be granted between them, and against other parties, by means of which each of the said joint-owners can obtain possession of half the property. 2It is proper that the same rule should be observed where a tenant brings property held in common with another upon the land, for the purpose of pledging the same, so that pursuit of the pledge may only be made for half of the value of the property in question.

2Ul­pia­nus li­bro sep­tua­gen­si­mo ad edic­tum. In Sal­via­no in­ter­dic­to, si in fun­dum com­mu­nem duo­rum pig­ne­ra sint ab ali­quo in­vec­ta, pos­ses­sor vin­cet et erit eis de­scen­den­dum ad Ser­via­num iu­di­cium.

2Ulpianus, On the Edict, Book LXX. In the Salvian Interdict, if the property to be pledged is brought upon land belonging to two joint-owners, the party in possession will be preferred, and they must have recourse to the Servian Action.